BRUSSELS | 29 SEPTEMBER 2025
FISC Hearing Addresses U.S. Tax Shifts, Pillar 2 Safeguards and EU Competitiveness
On 23 September, the FISC Subcommittee held a public hearing to examine the tax implications of recent US policy developments under the Trump II administration. Benjamin Angel (Director, DG TAXUD, EU Commission) described the interaction of the US corporate minimum-tax landscape of the net CFC-tested income (NCTI/ex-GILTI), Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT) and the 15% Minimum Tax. He discussed comparability issues with the OECD’s Pillar Two —especially jurisdictional vs global blending— while cautioning that both systems are complex, the overall effective rates may be similar. On the “side-by-side” arrangement, he stressed that any OECD safe harbour would need safeguards and would require legal changes if agreed; he also flagged ongoing EU work on permanent Pillar Two simplifications and a 2025 “tax omnibus” to review direct-tax legislation.
Prof Kimberly Clausing (Eric M. Zolt Chair in Tax Law and Policy, UCLA School of Law) argued the US regime is weaker on certain features (notably jurisdictional blending), underlined the role of UTPR in deterring free-riding, and pointed to sizeable recent US tax cuts for foreign income of multinationals as evidence of a softer stance. Quentin Parrinello (Policy Director, EU Tax Observatory) warned that equivalence for a global-blending regime could dilute incentives for low-tax jurisdictions to raise rates and weaken revenues and tax morale; he urged preserving a robust minimum-tax framework and caution on making concessions permanent.
BusinessEurope’s Chief Economist, Lúcio Vinhas de Souza, focused on EU competitiveness and simplification, arguing that uneven global take-up of Pillar Two risks asymmetries for EU firms. He called for practical measures within EU streamlined rules, improved withholding-tax/refund processes, stronger dispute resolution mechanisms, investment-supportive tax incentives—and cautioned against new turnover- or DST-type levies that may shift costs to EU users.
In Q&A, members probed spillovers from US-China tariffs, the role of trade-defence tools, prospects for UN-led tax talks, and how to keep the EU’s Savings & Investment Union attractive; speakers broadly agreed that tax is one of several competitiveness drivers and that certainty, simplification and coordinated international engagement remain priorities.
VAT in the Digital Age: EU Commission Publishes Implementation Strategy